Was Oliver Cromwell Related To Thomas Cromwell Family History I wish i were young. i wish i were a boy. i wish i were a policeman. i wish i were a rich man. all the above sentences suggest you want to be something you are factually not. in other words, you are not young, a boy, a policeman, a rich man and you are sorry that you are not young, a boy, a policeman, a rich man. if i were you, i wouldn't say that. What is the difference between "were" and "have been", and are these sentences gramatically correct? 1) some of the best known writers of detective fiction in the twentieth century were women. 2) some of the best known writers of detective fiction in the twentieth century have been women.
Ancient Black History Thomas Cromwell Oliver Cromwell Henry Viii Elizabeth I Mary I "if it were" or "if it was" can be used to give a hypothetical condition. it's not actually true that the car is a part, or an extension, of your body, but hypothetically if it was an extension, you would get the same feeling of flow. "if it is" could be used to give a condition that could (perhaps in the future) be true. "we were made to leave immediately" means we were compelled to leave immediately. "we were making to leave immediately" means we were acting as if we were leaving immediately. possibly we were hoping to be asked to stay, but we were not showing that. That is, both "were to" (using the irrealis "were") and "was to" (using a past tense verb) would usually be interchangeable in a sentence structured similar to yours, but that would be if the sentence was in non fiction text. since this sentence is in past tense narrative mode, the reader, as they are reading, would probably interpret something. Two of the successful managers were asked. one of the successful managers was asked. share. improve this.
Ancient Black History Thomas Cromwell Oliver Cromwell Henry Viii Elizabeth I Mary I That is, both "were to" (using the irrealis "were") and "was to" (using a past tense verb) would usually be interchangeable in a sentence structured similar to yours, but that would be if the sentence was in non fiction text. since this sentence is in past tense narrative mode, the reader, as they are reading, would probably interpret something. Two of the successful managers were asked. one of the successful managers was asked. share. improve this. The use of 'were' as a subjunctive auxiliary is probably more frequently missing than present these days, to the extent that you could arguably sound archaic if you do use 'were'. the need to use a past tense auxiliary is still present (eg "if i was to go out" vs "if i were to go out"), but the need for a plural form even with singular subjects. They were. (plural) she was. (singular) "bonnie and her associates" are "they" so you would say were: bonnie and her associates were invited to the gathering. however, in your sentence, the associates are not part of the subject, so you would say: bonnie, along with her associates, was invited to the gathering. If you really wanna go nuts with it "my thoughts were the ones that had begun to drive me slightly mad". this makes it sound like you and your thoughts are not entirely one, which might be stylistically kind of cool. The question is usually in the same form as the answer. so the answer might be these buildings were designed by lutyens the subject of the verb is the buildings. so, the question is "who were these buildings designed by>". you could also say "who was the architect who designed these buildings? lutyens was the architect. –.
Are Oliver And Thomas Cromwell Related Unraveling The Historical Connection The use of 'were' as a subjunctive auxiliary is probably more frequently missing than present these days, to the extent that you could arguably sound archaic if you do use 'were'. the need to use a past tense auxiliary is still present (eg "if i was to go out" vs "if i were to go out"), but the need for a plural form even with singular subjects. They were. (plural) she was. (singular) "bonnie and her associates" are "they" so you would say were: bonnie and her associates were invited to the gathering. however, in your sentence, the associates are not part of the subject, so you would say: bonnie, along with her associates, was invited to the gathering. If you really wanna go nuts with it "my thoughts were the ones that had begun to drive me slightly mad". this makes it sound like you and your thoughts are not entirely one, which might be stylistically kind of cool. The question is usually in the same form as the answer. so the answer might be these buildings were designed by lutyens the subject of the verb is the buildings. so, the question is "who were these buildings designed by>". you could also say "who was the architect who designed these buildings? lutyens was the architect. –.
Are Oliver And Thomas Cromwell Related Unraveling The Historical Connection If you really wanna go nuts with it "my thoughts were the ones that had begun to drive me slightly mad". this makes it sound like you and your thoughts are not entirely one, which might be stylistically kind of cool. The question is usually in the same form as the answer. so the answer might be these buildings were designed by lutyens the subject of the verb is the buildings. so, the question is "who were these buildings designed by>". you could also say "who was the architect who designed these buildings? lutyens was the architect. –.
Comments are closed.