Phony Navy Seal Of The Week Part Two The Water Up My Crap Pipe Phony Seal

Phony Navy Seal Of The Week Part Two The Water Up My Crap Pipe Phony Seal What does .phony mean in a makefile? i have gone through this, but it is too complicated. can somebody explain it to me in simple terms?. Me he encontrado muchas veces con esto: .phony al final de los archivos makefile y quisiera saber qué significa. yo he usado makefiles pero nunca he necesitado agregar eso. un ejemplo concreto de.

Phony Navy Seal Of The Week Part One The Water Up My Crap Pipe Phony Seal .phony tells gnu make the "all" target is phony you don't really intended for a file called "all" to be created and it should build the dependencies regardless if a file called "all" exists or not. added later: my example with all and prog1 above was not correct although the general idea is true. here is a much simple example all: prog prog. Should .phony: be included in each individual .mk file for the phony targets just in that file, or should there be some acculmulated list that is included only in the primary makefile?. I disagree with the premise that a makefile with all phony targets should be replaced by arbitrary scripts. make is an extremely prolific tool which has become the de facto standard for building most projects. The question is : is it possible to mass .phony the bottom half of the makefile, by taking advantage either of the stable name scheme (test %), or the position of targets in the file ? no. make does not have general purpose wildcards. % has a special interpretation in gnu make pattern rules (among other places), but a rule for .phony cannot be a pattern rule, because those require the target.

Phony Navy Seal Of The Week Gonna Beat You Up And Sue You Phony Seal I disagree with the premise that a makefile with all phony targets should be replaced by arbitrary scripts. make is an extremely prolific tool which has become the de facto standard for building most projects. The question is : is it possible to mass .phony the bottom half of the makefile, by taking advantage either of the stable name scheme (test %), or the position of targets in the file ? no. make does not have general purpose wildcards. % has a special interpretation in gnu make pattern rules (among other places), but a rule for .phony cannot be a pattern rule, because those require the target. While searching for the usage of .phony in makefile, i came accross this which says something like .phony also allows you to have targets that do not have an associated rule i put the example me. So in the makefile it looks like this: all: executable1 executable2 all target is usually the first in the makefile, since if you just write make in command line, without specifying the target, it will build the first target. and you expect it to be all. all is usually also a .phony target. learn more here. Second, it says "phony target should not be a prerequisite of a real" well, what if it is? the original question, did not specify if it is or it is not. the correct answer, is, not to declare your targets to be phony, but rather, declare an additional phony target, and then, depend the targets you want rebuilt, on that. Is the only purpose of all being listed as a prerequisite of .phony that i can still remake all three programs even if i accidentally, in the unlikely case, create a file in the same directory named all? you seem doubtful, but yes. that is the only purpose served by declaring all phony in that example. as the manual section you linked explains: there are two reasons to use a phony target: to.

Phony Navy Seal Of The Week Gonna Beat You Up And Sue You Phony Seal While searching for the usage of .phony in makefile, i came accross this which says something like .phony also allows you to have targets that do not have an associated rule i put the example me. So in the makefile it looks like this: all: executable1 executable2 all target is usually the first in the makefile, since if you just write make in command line, without specifying the target, it will build the first target. and you expect it to be all. all is usually also a .phony target. learn more here. Second, it says "phony target should not be a prerequisite of a real" well, what if it is? the original question, did not specify if it is or it is not. the correct answer, is, not to declare your targets to be phony, but rather, declare an additional phony target, and then, depend the targets you want rebuilt, on that. Is the only purpose of all being listed as a prerequisite of .phony that i can still remake all three programs even if i accidentally, in the unlikely case, create a file in the same directory named all? you seem doubtful, but yes. that is the only purpose served by declaring all phony in that example. as the manual section you linked explains: there are two reasons to use a phony target: to.

Phony Navy Seal Of The Week The Crossbow Phony Seal Part One Second, it says "phony target should not be a prerequisite of a real" well, what if it is? the original question, did not specify if it is or it is not. the correct answer, is, not to declare your targets to be phony, but rather, declare an additional phony target, and then, depend the targets you want rebuilt, on that. Is the only purpose of all being listed as a prerequisite of .phony that i can still remake all three programs even if i accidentally, in the unlikely case, create a file in the same directory named all? you seem doubtful, but yes. that is the only purpose served by declaring all phony in that example. as the manual section you linked explains: there are two reasons to use a phony target: to.