Posted This On R Historymemes Nothowgirlswork A new question is posted at stack overflow every 12 seconds. a new question is posted on stack overflow every 12 seconds. some examples from news websites: the supreme court in brisbane heard lorang goubran met mr spencer through an online sex ad posted to website craigslist and planned to rob him of drugs with a male accomplice. abc news. Stack exchange network. stack exchange network consists of 183 q&a communities including stack overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
What R Nothowgirlswork Do you write posts "on", "for", or "in" social media groups? for example, you could set up a rock band and publish updates on your facebook page about your new albums. I have certainly posted the letter this week. i certainly posted the letter this week. (the difference is in how the speaker is choosing to characterise the temporal relationships the first emphasises that "this week" is continuing, and chooses to see the posting as an event that is relevant to the present. They are both grammatical, and have a roughly similar meaning. the first is in the simple past tense, and refers to a situation of the past (i.e. definitely before the present moment) and without connection to the present (nothing is implied about what may be true now). "post with" is more abstract indicating an association of the name with the content being posted though one could interpret "post with x" to mean that it was a collaboration with x, or that x did the mechanics delivery of the posting and someone else was the author creator, arguably you could inject alternate meanings that are not incorrect.
Found This On R Nothowgirlswork R Periods They are both grammatical, and have a roughly similar meaning. the first is in the simple past tense, and refers to a situation of the past (i.e. definitely before the present moment) and without connection to the present (nothing is implied about what may be true now). "post with" is more abstract indicating an association of the name with the content being posted though one could interpret "post with x" to mean that it was a collaboration with x, or that x did the mechanics delivery of the posting and someone else was the author creator, arguably you could inject alternate meanings that are not incorrect. Here is posted out in a british university document: students are not eligible for another set of documents free of charge where: the documents were posted out more than six months ago; the documents were posted out to an address outside of the uk and less than 6 weeks have passed. essex university. This means that you have some letters that are addressed to the person you are speaking with that they are supposed to receive but you have not yet mailed posted them. so, if your intent is to say you're sending the letters on their behalf, i recommend using "for" and if you're sending the letters that are directed to them, i recommend using "to". Normally, i always use on chat when referring to something another user said commented about in the past. but recently, two or three other users have sometimes corrected me saying that it should in. I want to add at the end of an email the following sentence. i basically want to ask politely the other person to update me as soon as she has any news on the topic discussed in the email body.
Found On R Historymemes R Unexpectedbillwurtz Here is posted out in a british university document: students are not eligible for another set of documents free of charge where: the documents were posted out more than six months ago; the documents were posted out to an address outside of the uk and less than 6 weeks have passed. essex university. This means that you have some letters that are addressed to the person you are speaking with that they are supposed to receive but you have not yet mailed posted them. so, if your intent is to say you're sending the letters on their behalf, i recommend using "for" and if you're sending the letters that are directed to them, i recommend using "to". Normally, i always use on chat when referring to something another user said commented about in the past. but recently, two or three other users have sometimes corrected me saying that it should in. I want to add at the end of an email the following sentence. i basically want to ask politely the other person to update me as soon as she has any news on the topic discussed in the email body.
Comments are closed.