Why Aren T Chimps Still Evolving Into Humans The Mind Voyager I understand that the word spook is a racial slur that rose in usage during wwii; i also know germans called black gunners spookwaffe. what i don't understand is why. spook seems to also mean 'ghos. Why is 'c*nt' so much more derogatory in the us than the uk? ask question asked 14 years, 7 months ago modified 8 years, 11 months ago.
Dear Science Why Aren T Apes Evolving Into Humans The Washington Post The spelling of number is number, but the abbreviation is no (№). there is no letter o in number, so where does this spelling come from?. As jimi oke points out, it doesn't matter what letter the word starts with, but what sound it starts with. since "usual" starts with a 'y' sound, it should take 'a' instead of 'an'. also, if you say "today was an usual day", unless your pronunciation is extremely clear, you risk being misunderstood as "today was unusual day", which will only confuse your listeners. Americans don't all use "carmel". many of them think it's more correct to say "carr a mel", so you can find a number of examples of this pronunciation being used, especially in formal contexts. go through some of the youglish us pronunciations of "caramel". there is a word where a similar syncopated pronunciation is, as far as i know, universal for american english speakers: squirrel. Jsq29: it provides a justification for why the standard has changed, even if merriam webster hasn't caught up. ultimately, language is fluid even though some consider it sacred. thus, slash was once used in place of dot for abbreviations, the letter s was once written as f, just some examples.
Chimps More Evolved Than Humans Live Science Americans don't all use "carmel". many of them think it's more correct to say "carr a mel", so you can find a number of examples of this pronunciation being used, especially in formal contexts. go through some of the youglish us pronunciations of "caramel". there is a word where a similar syncopated pronunciation is, as far as i know, universal for american english speakers: squirrel. Jsq29: it provides a justification for why the standard has changed, even if merriam webster hasn't caught up. ultimately, language is fluid even though some consider it sacred. thus, slash was once used in place of dot for abbreviations, the letter s was once written as f, just some examples. I know it originates from "head shrinking", but it doesn't help me a lot to understand the etymology. why are psychiatrists called that? is it like "my head is swollen [from anguish, misery, stress. Why do people say "over " and "underwhelmed" but never just "whelmed"? ask question asked 14 years, 4 months ago modified 4 years, 4 months ago. The question is: why did the english adapt the name pineapple from spanish (which originally meant pinecone in english) while most european countries eventually adapted the name ananas, which came from the tupi word nanas (also meaning pineapple). I suspect because the phrase was only needed for women and widower is a much later literary invention. widow had a lot of legal implications for property, titles and so on. if the survivor of a marriage was a woman things got complicated before women had many rights. if the survivor was a man in the middle ages it didn't really make much difference as he held all the property anyway. a similar.
Chimps And Humans I know it originates from "head shrinking", but it doesn't help me a lot to understand the etymology. why are psychiatrists called that? is it like "my head is swollen [from anguish, misery, stress. Why do people say "over " and "underwhelmed" but never just "whelmed"? ask question asked 14 years, 4 months ago modified 4 years, 4 months ago. The question is: why did the english adapt the name pineapple from spanish (which originally meant pinecone in english) while most european countries eventually adapted the name ananas, which came from the tupi word nanas (also meaning pineapple). I suspect because the phrase was only needed for women and widower is a much later literary invention. widow had a lot of legal implications for property, titles and so on. if the survivor of a marriage was a woman things got complicated before women had many rights. if the survivor was a man in the middle ages it didn't really make much difference as he held all the property anyway. a similar.
Comments are closed.